Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an alternative for some cases of asymmetric mandibular prognathism
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fariña, R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mebus, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mayer, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Torrealba, R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moreno, E.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-08-30T15:36:00Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-08-30T15:36:00Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018; 47: 630–637
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.010
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151387
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The objective of this study was to propose a treatment protocol for patients with lateral prognathism based on the unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO). This was a prospective study involving 31 patients with lateral prognathism, who required a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Two groups were formed using the proposed protocol, with specific inclusion criteria for each group: BSSRO (n = 17) and USSRO (n = 14). Occlusal parameters (dental midline deviation, overbite, and overjet) were measured preoperatively (T0), at model surgery (T1), 1 month postoperative (T2), and 1 year after surgery (T3) and compared. P-values of <0.05 were considered significant. No significant difference was found between the USSRO and BSSRO groups for all occlusal parameters (TO, T1, T2, and T3). In both groups, there was a significant difference between T0 and T1 and no significant difference between T1 and T2 or T1 and T3 in all of the occlusal parameters; the exception was overbite between T1 and T2 in the BSSRO group, which showed a significant difference. No patient in either group showed signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction at T0 or T3. USSRO was found to be a stable alternative in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism. At the same time, it reduced the operating time and morbidity when compared to BSSRO.