Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorVargas, Ingrid 
Authordc.contributor.authorGarcia-Subirats, Irene 
Authordc.contributor.authorMogollón-Pérez, Amparo-Susana 
Authordc.contributor.authorFerreira-de-Medeiros-Mendes, Marina 
Authordc.contributor.authorEguiguren Bravo, Pamela 
Authordc.contributor.authorCisneros, Angelica-Ivonne 
Authordc.contributor.authorMuruaga, María-Cecilia 
Authordc.contributor.authorBertolotto, Fernando 
Authordc.contributor.authorVázquez, María-Luisa 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-10-01T14:44:40Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-10-01T14:44:40Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018-05
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationHealth Policy and Planning, 33, 2018, 494–504es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1093/heapol/czy016
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151878
Abstractdc.description.abstractAn adequate use of referral and reply letters-the main form of communication between primary care (PC) and out-patient secondary care (SC)-helps to avoid medical errors, test duplications and delays in diagnosis. However, it has been little studied to date in Latin America. The aim is to determine the level and characteristics of PC and SC doctors' use of referral and reply letters and to explore influencing factors in public healthcare networks of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey of PC and SC doctors working in public healthcare networks (348 doctors per country). The COORDENA questionnaire was applied to measure the frequency of use and receipt of referral and reply letters, quality of contents, timeliness and difficulties in using them. Descriptive analyses were conducted and a multivariate logistic regression model was generated to assess the relationship between frequent use and associated factors. The great majority of doctors claim that they send referral letters to the other level. However, only half of SC doctors (a higher proportion in Chile and Mexico) report that they receive referral letters and <20% of PC doctors receive a reply from specialists. Insufficient recording of data is reported in terms of medical history, tests and medication and the reason for referral. The factor associated with frequent use of the referral letter is doctors' age, while the use of reply letters is associated with identifying PC doctors as care coordinators, knowing them and trusting in their clinical skills, and receiving referral letters. Significant problems are revealed in the use of referral and reply letters which may affect quality of care. Multifaceted strategies are required that foster a direct contact between doctors and a better understanding of the PC-based model.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) 305197es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherOxford University Presses_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceHealth Policy and Planninges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCommunicationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectIntegrationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPrimary health carees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectReferral systemes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHealth services researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMultivariate analysises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSurveyes_ES
Títulodc.titleUnderstanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countrieses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile