Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBrutti, Lucrecia 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlvarado, Pablo 
Authordc.contributor.authorRojas, Tamara 
Authordc.contributor.authorMartensson, Anna 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:11:01Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:11:01Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science, Volumen 65, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 170-176
Identifierdc.identifier.issn16511913
Identifierdc.identifier.issn09064710
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1080/09064710.2014.977338
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/158352
Abstractdc.description.abstractChile's seedling production industry has been growing for the last 10 years, and demand has actually reached 1250 million seedlings per year. This system has special relevance due to the high cost of seeds. In addition, there is an increasing demand for substituting synthetic agrochemicals. Therefore, the potential use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in tomato production has been investigated. Before sowing, the micro-organisms provided by Biogram S.A. were inoculated into the substrate diluted in 250 mL/L unchlorinated water. The experiment was laid out in a 'split-plot' design with the two plant substrates as main plots and the inoculants as subplots, including six replicates per treatment. Tomato seedlings were grown using two different plant substrates: a mixture of 70% peat and 30% perlite by volume, and a substrate with 20% peat, 20% perlite and 60% compost by volume, both inoculated with Bacillus subtilis or Pseudomonas fluorescens or Bioroot (R), which is a commercial product containing B. subtilis, P. fluorescens, Trichoderma harzianum, yeast, algae and Nocardia. For control, uninoculated tomato seedlings were grown on the respective plant substrates. Variance analysis did not identify significant interactions between substrate type (main plots) and inoculation treatment (subplots), P <= 0.05. There were significant differences between inoculants (P <= 0.05). Means were compared by using the Tukey's multiple range test. Tomato growth in terms of leaf area (cm(2)/plant) and shoot and root dry weight (g/10 plants) was improved for the seedlings grown on the substrate with 70% peat and 30% perlite, compared to the compost containing an alternative that is valid for both uninoculated perlite peat and all inoculated treatments where perlite peat was outstanding. Inoculation with Bioroot (R) improved the leaf area, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, radical contact area, volume of roots and root forks compared with the control without inoculation, when both plant substrates were analysed together. Thus, inoculation with Bioroot (R) can be recommended as an alternative to tomato seedling growers' dependence on synthetic agrochemicals.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
Sourcedc.sourceActa Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science
Keywordsdc.subjectBacillus subtilis
Keywordsdc.subjectLycopersicon esculentum
Keywordsdc.subjectPGPR
Keywordsdc.subjectPseudomnas fluorecens
Keywordsdc.subjectrhizosphere
Keywordsdc.subjectTrichoderma harzianum
Títulodc.titleTomato seedling development is improved by a substrate inoculated with a combination of rhizobacteria and fungi
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatos
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrvh
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record