Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMoncada, Gustavo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMartin, Javier 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Godoy, Eduardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorHemnel, Marie 
Authordc.contributor.authorMjör, Ivar 
Authordc.contributor.authorGordan, Valeria 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:42Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:42Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2009
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Dental Association, Volumen 140, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 425-432.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00028177
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159060
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground. The authors conducted a clinical study to examine the effectiveness of treatments other than replacement for defective Class I and Class II resinbased composite (RBC) and amalgam (AM) restorations. Methods. The authors recruited 66 patients (age range, 18-80 years) with 271 Classes I and II defective restorations (RBC = 78 and AM = 193). They assigned restorations to one of the following treatment groups on the basis of the type of defect: sealed margins (n = 48), repair (n = 27), refurbishment (n = 73), replacement (n = 42) or untreated (n = 81). They used modified U.S. Public Health Service/Ryge criteria to determine the quality of the restorations. Two examiners assessed the restorations independently at the beginning of the study and three years after treatment (Cohen’s κ = 0.74 at baseline and 0.82 at year 3). They used five parameters in assessing the restorations: marginal adaptation, anatomical form, surface roughness, secondary caries and luster. Results. The authors assessed 237 restorations (RBC = 73, AM = 164) at the three-year recall examination. Restorations that underwent sealing of marginal defects exhibited significant improvements in marginal adaptation (P ≤ .001). Restorations in the refurbishment group exhibited improvements in anatomical form (P ≤ .005) and surface roughness (P ≤ .001). Restorations in the repair group exhibited improvements with regard to anatomical form (P = .008). Replaced restorations exhibited improvements in all parameters (P < .05), while the untreated group experienced declines in all parameters (P < .05). Conclusions. The results of this study show that defective RBC and AM Class I and Class II restorations undergoing sealing of margins, repair or refurbishment exhibited improvements three years after treatment. Clinical Implications. Marginal sealing or repair or refurbishment of anatomical form and roughness are conservative and simple procedures that increase the longevity of RBC and AM restorations with minimal intervention.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherAmerican Dental Association
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of the American Dental Association
Keywordsdc.subjectAlternative treatment
Keywordsdc.subjectAmalgam
Keywordsdc.subjectLongevity
Keywordsdc.subjectResin-based composite
Keywordsdc.subjectRestorations
Títulodc.titleSealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations A three-year clinical trial
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile