Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBrignardello Petersen, Romina 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco Labra, Alonso 
Authordc.contributor.authorAraya, Ignacio 
Authordc.contributor.authorYanine, Nicolas 
Authordc.contributor.authorBeyene, Joseph 
Authordc.contributor.authorShah, Prakesh 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:44Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:44Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2012
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volumen 70, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1789-1801.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn02782391
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15315053
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.008
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159080
Abstractdc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of low-level laser energy irradiation (LLEI) for decreasing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs). Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception, and conference proceedings, cross-references, and gray literature were searched for the last 5 years for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of any type of LLEI, compared with active or inactive treatments, in patients undergoing surgical removal of IMTMs. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed by 2 independent evaluators using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to estimate the mean difference of trismus between the groups. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran 2 and I2 . Results: Ten eligible trials were included in this systematic review. The included studies overall had a moderate risk of bias. Because of heterogeneity in the intervention and outcomes assessments, pain and swelling outcomes were only qualitatively summarized and indicated no beneficial effects of LLEI over placebo. Patients receiving LLEI had an average of 4.2 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 7.2) and 5.2 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.2) less trismus than patients receiving no active treatment on the second and seventh day after the surgery, respectively. Conclusions: There was no benefit of LLEI on pain or swelling and a moderate benefit on trismus after removal of IMTMs. It is necessary to standardize the intervention and outcomes assessment and to conduct adequately powered, well-designed trials to evaluate the efficacy of LLEI.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Keywordsdc.subjectSurgery
Keywordsdc.subjectOral Surgery
Keywordsdc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
Títulodc.titleIs adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile