Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brignardello Petersen, Romina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carrasco Labra, Alonso
Author
dc.contributor.author
Araya, Ignacio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Yanine, Nicolas
Author
dc.contributor.author
Beyene, Joseph
Author
dc.contributor.author
Shah, Prakesh
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-20T15:24:44Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-12-20T15:24:44Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2012
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volumen 70, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1789-1801.
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
02782391
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15315053
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.008
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159080
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of low-level laser energy irradiation (LLEI) for decreasing
pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs).
Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Central Register of Controlled Trials of the
Cochrane Library were searched from their inception, and conference proceedings, cross-references, and
gray literature were searched for the last 5 years for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials
that evaluated the effects of any type of LLEI, compared with active or inactive treatments, in patients
undergoing surgical removal of IMTMs. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed by 2 independent
evaluators using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to
estimate the mean difference of trismus between the groups. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran
2 and I2
.
Results: Ten eligible trials were included in this systematic review. The included studies overall had a moderate
risk of bias. Because of heterogeneity in the intervention and outcomes assessments, pain and swelling outcomes
were only qualitatively summarized and indicated no beneficial effects of LLEI over placebo. Patients receiving LLEI
had an average of 4.2 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 7.2) and 5.2 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.2)
less trismus than patients receiving no active treatment on the second and seventh day after the surgery,
respectively.
Conclusions: There was no benefit of LLEI on pain or swelling and a moderate benefit on trismus after
removal of IMTMs. It is necessary to standardize the intervention and outcomes assessment and to
conduct adequately powered, well-designed trials to evaluate the efficacy of LLEI.
Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis