Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMartin, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernandez, E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorEstay, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGordan, V. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMjor, I. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMoncada, G. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:45Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:45Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2013
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, Volumen 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 125-133.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn03617734
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.2341/12-062C
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159089
Abstractdc.description.abstractReplacement of dental restorations has been the traditional treatment for restorations that are defective. In this five-year randomized clinical trial, restorations with localized marginal defects were treated with sealants. Thirty-two patients (mean age, 26.8 years) with 126 Class I and Class II restorations with defective margins (amalgam n=69 and resinbased composite n=57) were recruited. Treatment was seal with pit and fissure sealant on localized marginal defects (group A: n=43) and was compared with total restoration replacement (group B: n=40) and untreated restorations (group C: n=43) as negative and positive controls. Restorations were assessed by two examiners using the modified US Public Health Service criteria, observing five clinical parameters: marginal adaptation, roughness, marginal stain, teeth sensitivity, and secondary caries at baseline and at five years after treatment. At the five-year recall examination, 23 patients with 90 restorations (71.4% recall rate) were examined. A significant improvement was observed in the marginal adaptation of the restorations in group A compared with group B. None of the treated group showed trends to downgrade in any parameter. Tooth sensitivity and secondary caries showed a low frequency in all groups. No significant difference in marginal adaptation of the restorations was found between amalgam and resin-based composite restorations (p=0.191). This study demonstrated that marginal sealing of restorations is a minimally invasive treatment that may be used instead of the replacement of restorations with localized marginal defects.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceOperative Dentistry
Keywordsdc.subjectDentistry (all)
Títulodc.titleMinimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: Five-year results using sealants
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile