Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCea Muñoz, Gabriel 
Authordc.contributor.authorBenatar, Michael 
Authordc.contributor.authorVerdugo Latorre, Renato 
Authordc.contributor.authorSalinas, Rodrigo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:24:46Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:24:46Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2013
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Volumen 2013, Issue 10, 2013.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1469493X
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1002/14651858.CD008111.pub2
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159096
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground Treatments currently used for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) include steroids, non-steroid immune suppressive agents, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and thymectomy. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the use of some of these therapeutic modalities and the evidence for non-surgical therapies are the subject of other Cochrane reviews. Significant uncertainty and variation persist in clinical practice regarding the potential role of thymectomy in the treatment of people with MG. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of thymectomy in the management of people with non-thymomatous MG. Search methods On 31 March 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2013) and LILACS (January 1992 to March 2013) for RCTs. Two authors (RS and GC) read all retrieved abstracts and reviewed the full texts of potentially relevant articles. These two authors checked references of all manuscripts identified in the review to identify additional articles that were of relevance and contacted experts in the field to identify additional published and unpublished data. Where necessary, authors were contacted for further information. Selection criteria Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of thymectomy against no treatment or any medical treatment, and thymectomy plus medical treatment against medical treatment alone, in people with non-thymomatous MG. We did not use measured outcomes as criteria for study selection. Data collection and analysis We planned that two authors would independently extract data onto a specially designed data extraction form and assess risk of bias; however, there were no included studies in the review. We would have identified any adverse effects of thymectomy from the included trials. Main results We did not identify any RCTs testing the efficacy of thymectomy in the treatment of MG. In the absence of data from RCTs, we were unable to do any further analysis. Authors’ conclusions There is no randomized controlled trial literature that allows meaningful conclusions about the efficacy of thymectomy on MG. Data from several class III observational studies suggest that thymectomy could be beneficial in MG. An RCT is needed to elucidate if thymectomy is useful, and to what extent, in MG.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Keywordsdc.subjectPharmacology (medical)
Títulodc.titleThymectomy for non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile