Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorJiménez Silva, Antonio 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarnevali-Arellano, Romano 
Authordc.contributor.authorVenegas Aguilera, Matías 
Authordc.contributor.authorTobar Reyes, Julio 
Authordc.contributor.authorPalomino Montenegro, Hernán 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T15:25:07Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T15:25:07Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Odontologica Scandinavica, Volumen 76, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 262-273.
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15023850
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00016357
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1080/00016357.2017.1416165
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159151
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: To determine if the use of orthopaedic appliances in growing patients applied to correct Class II and III malocclusion is related to the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Material and methods: A systematic review was conducted between 1960 and July 2017, based on electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Scielo, Lilacs and Bireme. Controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. The articles were selected and analyzed by two authors independently. The quality of the evidence was determined according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool and the Cochrane Quality Study Guide. Results: Seven articles were included, four CCTs and three RCTs. The studies were grouped according to malocclusion treatment in (a) class II appliances (n ¼ 4) and (b) class III appliances (n ¼ 3). The quality of evidence was low due to the high risk of bias, independent of the association reported. All studies concluded that the use of orthopaedic appliances would not contribute to the development of TMD. Conclusions: The quality of evidence available is insufficient to establish definitive conclusions, since the studies were very heterogeneous and presented a high risk of bias. However, it is suggested that the use of orthopaedic appliances to correct class II and III malocclusion in growing patients would not be considered as a risk factor for the development of TMD. High-quality RCTs are required to draw any definitive conclusions.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceActa Odontologica Scandinavica
Keywordsdc.subjectClass II
Keywordsdc.subjectclass III
Keywordsdc.subjectdentofacial orthopaedics
Keywordsdc.subjecttemporomandibular disorders
Keywordsdc.subjecttemporomandibular joint
Títulodc.titleTemporomandibular disorders in growing patients after treatment of class II and III malocclusion with orthopaedic appliances: a systematic review
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile