Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations
Author
dc.contributor.author
Neumann, Ignacio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alonso Coello, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Olav Vandvik, Per
Author
dc.contributor.author
Agoritsas, Thomas
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mas, Gemma
Author
dc.contributor.author
Akl, Elie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brignardello Petersen, Romina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Emparanza, José
Author
dc.contributor.author
McCullagh, Lauren
Author
dc.contributor.author
De Sitio, Catherine
Author
dc.contributor.author
McGinn, Thomas
Author
dc.contributor.author
Almodaimegh, Hind
Author
dc.contributor.author
Almodaimegh, Khalid
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rivera, Solange
Author
dc.contributor.author
Roja, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Stirnemann, Jérôme
Author
dc.contributor.author
Irani, Jihad
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hlais, Sani
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mustafa, Reem
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bdair, Fadi
Author
dc.contributor.author
Aly, Abdelrahman
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kristiansen, Annette
Author
dc.contributor.author
Izcovich, Ariel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ramirez, Anggie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brozek, Jan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sch€unemann, Holger
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-20T15:25:08Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-12-20T15:25:08Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volumen 99, 2018, Pages 33-40.
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
18785921
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
08954356
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.026
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/159156
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making and to reduce
the gap between best current research evidence and clinical practice. However, some argue that providing preappraised evidence summaries
alone, rather than recommendations, is more appropriate. The objective of the study is to evaluate clinicians’ preferences, and understanding of the evidence and intended course of action in response to evidence summaries with and without recommendations.
Study Design Setting: We included practicing clinicians attending educational sessions across 10 countries. Clinicians were randomized to receive relevant clinical scenarios supported by research evidence of low or very low certainty and accompanied by either strong or weak recommendations developed with the GRADE system. Within each group, participants were further randomized to receive the recommendation plus the corresponding evidence summary or the evidence summary alone. We evaluated participants’ preferences and understanding for the presentation strategy, as well as their intended course of action.
Results: One hundred eighty-nine of 219 (86%) and 201 of 248 (81%) participants preferred having recommendations accompanying
evidence summaries for both strong and weak recommendations, respectively. Across all scenarios, less than half of participants correctly
interpreted information provided in the evidences summaries (e.g., estimates of effect, certainty in the research evidence). The presence of a
recommendation resulted in a more appropriate intended course of action for two scenarios involving strong recommendations.
Conclusion: Evidence summaries alone are not enough to impact clinicians’ course of action. Clinicians clearly prefer having recommendations accompanying evidence summaries in the context of low or very low certainty of evidence (Trial registration
NCT02006017).