A reply to professor Seedhouse
| Author | dc.contributor.author | Kottow, Michael H. | |
| Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-29T14:12:16Z | |
| Available date | dc.date.available | 2019-01-29T14:12:16Z | |
| Publication date | dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
| Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Medical Ethics 1999;25:349-350 | |
| Identifier | dc.identifier.issn | 03066800 | |
| Identifier | dc.identifier.other | 10.1136/jme.25.4.349 | |
| Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/160156 | |
| Abstract | dc.description.abstract | This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasise that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easely refuted. | |
| Lenguage | dc.language.iso | en | |
| Publisher | dc.publisher | BMJ | |
| Type of license | dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile | |
| Link to License | dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/ | |
| Source | dc.source | Journal of Medical Ethics | |
| Keywords | dc.subject | Ethical discourse | |
| Keywords | dc.subject | Euthanasia | |
| Keywords | dc.subject | Medical ethics | |
| Título | dc.title | A reply to professor Seedhouse | |
| Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | |
| Cataloguer | uchile.catalogador | laj | |
| Indexation | uchile.index | Artículo de publicación SCOPUS | |
| uchile.cosecha | uchile.cosecha | SI |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Artículos de revistas
Artículos de revistas
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile