Classical medicine v alternative medical practices
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kottow,
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-01-29T14:52:12Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-01-29T14:52:12Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
1992
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Medical Ethics, Volumen 18, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 18-22
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
03066800
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1136/jme.18.1.18
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/161040
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Classical medicine operates in a climate of rational discourse scientific knowledge accretion and the acceptance of ethical standards that regulate its activities. Criticism has centred on the excessive technological emphasis of modem medicine and on its social strategy aimed at defending exclusiveness and the privileges of professional status. Alternative therapeutic approaches have taken advantage of the eroded public image of medicine offering treatments based on holistic philosophies that stress the non-rational non-technical and non-scientific approach to the unwell disregarding traditional diagnostic categories and concentrating on enhancing subjective comfort and well-being but remaining oblivious to the organic substrate of disease. This leads to questionable ethics in terms of false hopes and lost opportunities for effective therapy.