Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Navarro, Alberto J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBerde, Charles B. 
Authordc.contributor.authorWiedmaier, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMercado, Andres 
Authordc.contributor.authorGarcia, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorIglesias, Veronica 
Authordc.contributor.authorZurakowski, David 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T15:36:36Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-01-29T15:36:36Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2011
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Volumen 36, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 103-109
Identifierdc.identifier.issn10987339
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182030662
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/161786
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Wound infiltration with available local anesthetics generally provides analgesia for less than 8 hrs. The site 1 sodium-channel toxin neosaxitoxin (neoSTX) produced analgesia for over 24 hrs in animals and human volunteers. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we examined the postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under a standardized general anesthesia with wound infiltration using either neoSTX or bupivacaine. We hypothesized that neoSTX would reduce pain compared with bupivacaine at 12 hrs postoperatively. Methods: Patients received preincisional infiltration of laparoscope entry sites with 20 mL containing either neoSTX (total dose, 100 μg) or bupivacaine 0.25% (total dose, 50 mg). The primary outcome measure was the visual analog pain score at 12 hrs postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included repeated pain scores at rest and with movement, analgesic use, functional recovery, and adverse effects. Groups were compared
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Keywordsdc.subjectAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Títulodc.titleComparison of neosaxitoxin versus bupivacaine via port infiltration for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, double-blind trial
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorSCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile