Euthanasia and medical act Eutanasia y acto médico
Author
dc.contributor.author
Echeverría Carlos, B.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Goic Goic, Alejandro
Author
dc.contributor.author
Herrera C., Carolina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Quintana V., Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rojas O., Alberto
Author
dc.contributor.author
Salinas R, Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Serani M., Alejandro
Author
dc.contributor.author
Taboada R., Paulina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vacarezza Y., Ricardo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-01-29T15:36:40Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-01-29T15:36:40Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2011
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Revista Medica de Chile, Volumen 139, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 642-654
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00349887
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
07176163
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.4067/S0034-98872011000500013
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/161808
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Right to life -as the prohibition of intentionally and arbitrarily taking life, even with authorization of the concerned one- is an internationally recognized right. In many countries, debate regarding euthanasia is more centered in its convenience, social acceptability and how it is regulated, than in its substantial legitimacy. Some argue that euthanasia should be included as part of clinical practice of health professionals, grounded on individual's autonomy claims-everyone having the liberty to choose how to live and how to die. Against this, others sustain that life has a higher value than autonomy, exercising autonomy without respecting the right to life would become a serious moral and social problem. Likewise, euthanasia supporters sometimes claim a 'right to live with dignity', which must be understood as a personal obligation, referred more to the ethical than to the strictly legal sphere. In countries where it is already legalized, euthanasia practice has extended to cases w