Moclobemide and imipramine in chronic depression (dysthymia): An international double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Author
dc.contributor.author
Versiani, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Amrein, R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Stabl, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Magistris,
Author
dc.contributor.author
Udabe, R. Ucha
Author
dc.contributor.author
Da Costa, Delcir A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Nardi, A. E.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Versiani, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Capponi, R.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-01-29T15:54:59Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-01-29T15:54:59Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
1997
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
International Clinical Psychopharmacology, Volumen 12, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 183-193
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
02681315
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/162750
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
An international, multicenter, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the safety and antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide, a new reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, and imipramine in the treatment of dysthymia (DSM-III-R). A total of 315 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment in one of three groups (moclobemide, imipramine and placebo). Patients were male or female outpatients aged between 18 and 65 years meeting DSM III-R criteria for dysthymia, primary type, with late or early onset. Of the patients in each group 85% completed the 8-week treatment period. The percentage of patients who no longer fulfilled DSM-III-R symptom criteria at treatment end-point was significantly higher in the moclobemide (60%) and imipramine (49%) treatment groups than in the placebo group (22%). Differences to placebo were also statistically significant both for moclobemide and for imipramine on the other efficacy variables (i.e. Hamilton Rating Scale f