Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGoic Goic, Alejandro 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T17:57:09Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-01-29T17:57:09Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2005
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRev Méd Chile 2005; 133: 371-375
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00349887
Identifierdc.identifier.issn07176163
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/163941
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn the Judeo-Christian tradition, human life is held to be sacred, a semblance of the divine and a gift from God which the individual cannot dispose of at his or her own will. Hence, these monotheistic religions have made of the crime of murder a transgression of God’s own commandment not to kill and have extended the applicability of this commandment to the practice of euthanasia and suicide. On the other hand, some non-religious traditions offer plausible reasons favoring euthanasia. This is a delicate matter for physicians, since the Hippocratic tradition forbids euthanasia and because as care-givers they must also bear the psychological, moral and emotional burden of carrying it out. Physicians are trained to preserve life but not to bring it to an end. As human beings, they must always respect the principle of nonmaleficence, and as physicians they must always respect as well the principle of beneficence. It is difficult to accept the fact that ending a human life can be an act of beneficence. In order to differentiate between passive and active euthanasia, the concept of proportionality of medical acts must be brought into consideration. For instance, using high doses of opiates to alleviate pain or withholding the use of an extraordinary method of treatment are not passive acts aimed at ending the life of a terminally ill patient, but medical acts that are reasonable, judicious and proportionate to the condition and irreversibility of a patient’s illness. Therefore, so-called passive euthanasia cannot be considered the same as euthanasia. On the other hand, medically assisted suicide is a deceitful form of active euthanasia. The aim of this act is to cause death and the physician is morally responsible for such a death, since he is providing the means for bringing a human life to an end. Many times the desire to die expressed by terminally ill elderly and helpless patients is a request for help and an expression of reproach against a society that allows for their abandonment and neglect.
Lenguagedc.language.isosp
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Médica de Chile
Keywordsdc.subjectActive
Keywordsdc.subjectAssisted
Keywordsdc.subjectEuthanasia
Keywordsdc.subjectPassive
Keywordsdc.subjectPrinciple-based ethics
Keywordsdc.subjectSuicide
Keywordsdc.subjectTerminal care
Títulodc.titleApuntes sobre la eutanasia
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeNotes on euthanasia
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile