Gaining efficiencies: Resources and demand for dialysis around the globe
Author
dc.contributor.author
Neil, Nancy
Author
dc.contributor.author
Walker, David R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sesso, Ricardo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Blackburn, Juan Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tschosik, Elizabeth A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sciaraffia, Vito
Author
dc.contributor.author
García-Contreras, Fernando
Author
dc.contributor.author
Capsa, Dimitrie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bhattacharyya, Samir K.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T12:56:52Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T12:56:52Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2009
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Value in Health, Volumen 12, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 73-79
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15244733
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
10983015
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00414.x
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/164680
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a debilitating condition resulting in death unless treated. Treatment options are transplantation and dialysis. Alternative dialysis modalities are peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), each of which has been shown to produce similar outcomes and survival. Nevertheless, the financial implications of each modality are different and these differences vary by country, especially in the developing world. Changes in clinically appropriate dialysis delivery leading to more efficient use of resources would increase the resources available to treat ESRD or other disabling conditions. This article outlines the relative advantages of HD and PD and uses budget impact analysis to estimate the country-specific, 5-year financial implications on total dialysis costs assuming utilization shifts from HD to PD in two high-income (UK, Singapore), three upper-middle-income (Mexico, Chile, Romania), and three lower-middle-income (Thailand, China, Colo