Grasping psychoanalysts' practice in its own merits
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez, Juan Pablo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T12:57:34Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T12:57:34Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2009
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Volumen 90, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 231-248
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00207578
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
17458315
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00132.x
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/164769
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The central objective of this presentation is to reflect on the obstacles involved in the task proposed by the Chicago Congress, which is to explore convergences and divergences in psychoanalytic practice. The author discusses two major obstacles. First, the epistemological and methodological problems in relation to the construction of theory in psychoanalysis and especially the inaccessibility, in any reliable way, of what psychoanalysts really do in the intimacy of their practice. He proposes to separate, at least in part, theory from practice in psychoanalysis, in an attempt to grasp psychoanalysts' practice in its own merits. He then outlines a phenomenology of the practice of psychoanalysis, which reveals that, in their work with patients, analysts are guided more by practical reasons than theoretical reasons; that is, their interventions are predictions rather than explanations. Since these practical reasons need to be validated constantly in the analytic relationship based on th