Ethical quandaries posing as conflicts of interest
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kottow, Miguel
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:00:12Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:00:12Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2010
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Medical Ethics, Volumen 36, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 328-332
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
03066800
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
14734257
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1136/jme.2009.034710
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165060
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Conflicts of interest are receiving increased attention in medical research, clinical practice and education. Criticism of, and penalties for, conflicts of interest have been insufficiently discussed and have been applied without adequate conceptual backing. Genuine conflicts of interest are situations in which alternative courses of action are ethically equivalent, decision-making being less a matter of moral deliberation than of personal weighing of interest. In contrast, situations usually thought of as conflicts of interest are mostly temptations to follow an attractive but undue option that causes harm by failing to uphold well-entrenched ethical standards. Examples of moral quandaries that pose as ethically neutral conflicts of interest are healthcare providers enticed to favour certain products; patients being referred to non-therapeutic trials entailing risks and non-optimal healthcare; industry-supported scientists failing to deliver unbiased research results and reports or pa