Bipolar depression and unipolar depression: Differential diagnosis in clinical practice El diagnóstico diferencial entre la depresión bipolar y la depresión monopolar en la práctica clínica
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fanny Leyton, A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Álvaro Barrera, A.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:00:16Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:00:16Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2010
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Revista Medica de Chile, Volumen 138, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 773-779
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
07176163
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00349887
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165076
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
When assessing a patient with depression it is crucial not to miss a diagnosis of bipolar depression. In this review we suggest that it can be achieved, first, by consistently using standardised diagnostic criteria (e.g. DSM-IV-TR or ICD 10) and, second, by ascertaining the presence of some clinical features. The latter include previous episodes of mood elevation, current or past episodes of psychotic depression, onset of recurrent depressive disorder before the age of 25, a strong family history of mood disorder and suicide, lack of response or "wearing off" of response to well conducted antidepressant treatment, and an unusually fast response to antidepressants with features of elation. Although more and better research is required to establish the validity, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of each one of these features we suggest that from a practical point of view they would increase clinicians' awareness of bipolar depression.
Bipolar depression and unipolar depression: Differential diagnosis in clinical practice El diagnóstico diferencial entre la depresión bipolar y la depresión monopolar en la práctica clínica