Neutral illusions, selective nightmares and autopoietic madness
Author
dc.contributor.author
Valenzuela Yuraidini, Carlos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:00:57Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:00:57Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2010
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, Volumen 83, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 497-500
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0716078X
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
07176317
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.4067/S0716-078X2010000400004
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165176
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Until now, there are three evolutionary models: I) The Synthetic Theory of Evolution (STE) also named as the Neo-Darwinian model; II) The Neutral Theory of Evolution (NTE) with its daughter the Nearly-Neutral Theory of Evolution (NNTE); III) The Theory of Evolution by means of Natural Drift (NDTE) (Valenzuela 2007, 2009). All these theories accept that variation of genomes of living beings emerges by mutation. They disagree in relation of the causes of the acquisition and maintenance of the living being organization. STE proposes that the main factor for the acquisition and maintenance of fixated organization is selection and a marginal role of genetic drift. NTE proposed that the acquisition and maintenance of fixated organization is drift with a marginal role of selection, its daughter the NNTE includes besides selection with coefficients similar to the mutation rates. NDTE is derived from the conception of living beings as autopoietic processes, thus the acquisition and maintenance