Performance evaluation of paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in healthy young children
Author
dc.contributor.author
Seplúveda, P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cortínez, L. I.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sáez, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Penna, A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Solari, S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guerra, I.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Absalom, A. R.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:02:21Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:02:21Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2011
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
British Journal of Anaesthesia, Volumen 107, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 593-600
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00070912
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
14716771
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1093/bja/aer198
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165328
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background The performance of eight currently available paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in target-controlled infusions (TCIs) was assessed, in healthy children from 3 to 26 months of age. Methods Forty-one, ASA III children, aged 326 months were studied. After the induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil, a propofol bolus dose of 2.5 mg kg-1 followed by an infusion of 8 mg kg-1 h-1 was given. Arterial blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 min post-bolus, at the end of surgery, and at 1, 3, 5, 30, 60, and 120 min after stopping the infusion. Model performance was visually inspected with measured/predicted plots. Median performance error (MDPE) and the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) were calculated to measure bias and accuracy of each model. Results Performance of the eight models tested differed markedly during the different stages of propofol administration. Most models underestimated propofol concentration 1 min