Laparoscopic surgical treatment for patients with short- and long-segment Barrett's esophagus: Which technique in which patient?
Author
dc.contributor.author
Braghetto Miranda, Italo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Korn Bruzzone, Owen
Author
dc.contributor.author
Valladares Hernández, Héctor
Author
dc.contributor.author
Debandi Cuadra, Aníbal
Author
dc.contributor.author
Díaz, Juan Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brunet, Luis
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:03:06Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:03:06Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2011
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
International Surgery, Volumen 96, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 95-103
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00208868
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.9738/CC29.1
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165461
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is very successful in patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus (BE), but in patients with long-segment BE, the results remain in discussion. In these patients, during the open era of surgery, we performed acid suppression + duodenal diversion procedures added to the antireflux procedure (fundoplication + vagotomy + antrectomy + Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy) to obtain better results at long-term follow-up. The aim of this prospective study is to present the results of 3 to 5 years' follow-up in patients with short-segment and long-segment or complicated BE (ulcer or stricture) who underwent fundoplication or the acid suppression-duodenal diversion technique, both performed by a laparoscopic approach. One hundred eight patients with histologically confirmed BE were included: 58 patients with short-segment BE, and 50 with long-segment BE, 28 of whom had complications associated with severe erosive esophagitis, ulcer, or stricture. After surgery, among