Objective vs. self-reported physical activity and sedentary time: Effects of measurement method on relationships with risk biomarkers
Author
dc.contributor.author
Celis Morales, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Bravo, Francisco
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ibañez, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Salas, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bailey, Mark E.S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gill, Jason M.R.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-11T13:03:50Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-11T13:03:50Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2012
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
PLoS ONE, Volumen 7, Issue 5, 2018,
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
19326203
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1371/journal.pone.0036345
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165532
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: Imprecise measurement of physical activity variables might attenuate estimates of the beneficial effects of activity on health-related outcomes. We aimed to compare the cardiometabolic risk factor dose-response relationships for physical activity and sedentary behaviour between accelerometer- and questionnaire-based activity measures. Methods: Physical activity and sedentary behaviour were assessed in 317 adults by 7-day accelerometry and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Fasting blood was taken to determine insulin, glucose, triglyceride and total, LDL and HDL cholesterol concentrations and homeostasis model-estimated insulin resistance (HOMAIR). Waist circumference, BMI, body fat percentage and blood pressure were also measured. Results: For both accelerometer-derived sedentary time (<100 counts.min-1) and IPAQ-reported sitting time significant positive (negative for HDL cholesterol) relationships were observed with all measured risk factors - i.e. increa