Transferring sampling errors into geostatistical modelling
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cuba, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Leuangthong, O.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ortiz, J.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-15T16:04:22Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-15T16:04:22Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2012
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Volumen 112, Issue 11, 2018, Pages 971-983
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
22256253
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165951
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Geostatistical modelling aims at providing unbiased estimates of the grades of elements of economic interest in mining operations, and assessing the associated uncertainty in these resources and reserves. Conventional practice consists of using the data as errorfree values and performing the typical steps of data analysis - domaining, semivariogram analysis, and estimation/simulation. However, in many mature deposits, information comes from different drilling campaigns that were sometimes completed decades ago, when little or no quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures were available. Although this legacy data may have significant sampling errors, it provides valuable information and should be combined with more recent data that has been subject to strict QA/QC procedures. In this paper we show that ignoring the errors associated with sample data considerably underestimates the uncertainty (and consequently the economic risk) associated with a mining project. We also pr