How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: Users' guides to the medical literature
Author
dc.contributor.author
Murad, Mohammad Hassan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Montori, Victor M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ioannidis, John P A
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jaeschke, Roman
Author
dc.contributor.author
Devereaux, P. J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Prasad, Kameshwar
Author
dc.contributor.author
Neumann, Ignacio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carrasco Labra, Alonso
Author
dc.contributor.author
Agoritsas, Thomas
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hatala, Rose
Author
dc.contributor.author
Meade, Maureen O.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wyer, Peter
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cook, Deborah J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-15T16:06:47Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-15T16:06:47Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Volumen 312, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 171-179
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15383598
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00987484
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1001/jama.2014.5559
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166202
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Clinical decisions should be based on the totality of the best evidence and not the results of individual studies. When clinicians apply the results of a systematic review or meta-analysis to patient care, they should start by evaluating the credibility of the methods of the systematic review, ie, the extent to which these methods have likely protected against misleading results. Credibility depends on whether the review addressed a sensible clinical question; included an exhaustive literature search; demonstrated reproducibility of the selection and assessment of studies; and presented results in a useful manner. For reviews that are sufficiently credible, clinicians must decide on the degree of confidence in the estimates that the evidence warrants (quality of evidence). Confidence depends on the risk of bias in the body of evidence; the precision and consistency of the results; whether the results directly apply to the patient of interest; and the likelihood of reporting bias. Share