Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMurad, Mohammad Hassan 
Authordc.contributor.authorMontori, Victor M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorIoannidis, John P A 
Authordc.contributor.authorJaeschke, Roman 
Authordc.contributor.authorDevereaux, P. J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPrasad, Kameshwar 
Authordc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacio 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco Labra, Alonso 
Authordc.contributor.authorAgoritsas, Thomas 
Authordc.contributor.authorHatala, Rose 
Authordc.contributor.authorMeade, Maureen O. 
Authordc.contributor.authorWyer, Peter 
Authordc.contributor.authorCook, Deborah J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon H. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-03-15T16:06:47Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-03-15T16:06:47Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Volumen 312, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 171-179
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15383598
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00987484
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1001/jama.2014.5559
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166202
Abstractdc.description.abstractClinical decisions should be based on the totality of the best evidence and not the results of individual studies. When clinicians apply the results of a systematic review or meta-analysis to patient care, they should start by evaluating the credibility of the methods of the systematic review, ie, the extent to which these methods have likely protected against misleading results. Credibility depends on whether the review addressed a sensible clinical question; included an exhaustive literature search; demonstrated reproducibility of the selection and assessment of studies; and presented results in a useful manner. For reviews that are sufficiently credible, clinicians must decide on the degree of confidence in the estimates that the evidence warrants (quality of evidence). Confidence depends on the risk of bias in the body of evidence; the precision and consistency of the results; whether the results directly apply to the patient of interest; and the likelihood of reporting bias. Share
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherAmerican Medical Association
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Keywordsdc.subjectMedicine (all)
Títulodc.titleHow to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: Users' guides to the medical literature
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorSCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile