Programa colaborativo a distancia
para el tratamiento de la enfermedad
depresiva
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rojas, María Graciela
Author
dc.contributor.author
Castro, Ariel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guajardo, Viviana
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alvarado, Rubén
Author
dc.contributor.author
Isamit, Cristian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fritsch, Rosemarie
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-15T16:07:51Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-15T16:07:51Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Rev Med Chile 2014; 142: 1142-1149
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
07176163
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00349887
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166315
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: In the treatment of depression, primary care teams play an
important role, whose effectiveness improves when inserted into a collaborative
model of disease management. Aim: To report the results of a clinical trial
carried out to test the effectiveness of a collaborative program between primary
health teams and specialists supported by an electronic platform. Material and
Methods: Physicians from four community hospitals belonging to the Reloncavi
Health Service network, recruited 81 patients with depression aged 37 to 43 years,
84% of whom were female. Participants were divided in an active group, which
participated in the collaborative program and a control group, which received the
usual care, according to the Ministry of Health’s Guidelines for Depression. The
main outcome was the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I) score at three months
of intervention. Results: Participants had an average of 29.6 points (95% CI:
27.6-31.6) in the BDI-I and 38% of them had a high suicide risk. There were no
statistically significant baseline differences between active and control group. In
the intervention group, the BDI-I score changed from 30.0 (95% CI 27.0 to 32.8)
to 15.3 (95% CI 11.8 to 18.8). In the control group the score changed from 29.2
(95% CI: 26.4 - 31.9) points to 20.8 (95% CI 16.8 to 24.7). The decrease was
significantly higher in the intervention groups. Conclusions: A program of this
kind may be useful to assist primary care teams in remote areas of the country
to improve treatment outcomes for depression.