Intasome architecture and chromatin density modulate retroviral integration into nucleosome
Author
dc.contributor.author
Benleulmi, Salah S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Matysiak, Julien
Author
dc.contributor.author
Henríquez, Rodrigo R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vaillant, Cédric
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lesbats, Paul
Author
dc.contributor.author
Calmels, Christina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Naughtin, Monica
Author
dc.contributor.author
León, Oscar
Author
dc.contributor.author
Skalka, Anna Marie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ruff, Marc
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lavigne, Marc
Author
dc.contributor.author
Andreola, Marie Line
Author
dc.contributor.author
Parissi, Vincent
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-15T16:08:57Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-15T16:08:57Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Retrovirology (2015) 12:13
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
17424690
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/s12977-015-0145-9
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166382
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: Retroviral integration depends on the interaction between intasomes, host chromatin and cellular
targeting cofactors as LEDGF/p75 or BET proteins. Previous studies indicated that the retroviral integrase, by itself,
may play a role in the local integration site selection within nucleosomal target DNA. We focused our study on this
local association by analyzing the intrinsic properties of various retroviral intasomes to functionally accommodate
different chromatin structures in the lack of other cofactors.
Results: Using in vitro conditions allowing the efficient catalysis of full site integration without these cofactors, we
show that distinct retroviral integrases are not equally affected by chromatin compactness. Indeed, while PFV and
MLV integration reactions are favored into dense and stable nucleosomes, HIV-1 and ASV concerted integration
reactions are preferred into poorly dense chromatin regions of our nucleosomal acceptor templates. Predicted
nucleosome occupancy around integration sites identified in infected cells suggests the presence of a nucleosome
at the MLV and HIV-1 integration sites surrounded by differently dense chromatin. Further analyses of the relationships
between the in vitro integration site selectivity and the structure of the inserted DNA indicate that structural constraints
within intasomes could account for their ability to accommodate nucleosomal DNA and could dictate their capability to
bind nucleosomes functionally in these specific chromatin contexts.
Conclusions: Thus, both intasome architecture and compactness of the chromatin surrounding the targeted nucleosome
appear important determinants of the retroviral integration site selectivity. This supports a mechanism involving a global
targeting of the intasomes toward suitable chromatin regions followed by a local integration site selection modulated by
the intrinsic structural constraints of the intasomes governing the target DNA bending and dictating their sensitivity
toward suitable specific nucleosomal structures and density.