Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSnyder, M. J.
Authordc.contributor.authorGonzalez, O. A.
Authordc.contributor.authorPalomino, C.
Authordc.contributor.authorMusic, S. I.
Authordc.contributor.authorHornick, R. B.
Authordc.contributor.authorPerroni, J.
Authordc.contributor.authorWoodward, W. E.
Authordc.contributor.authorGonzalez, C.
Authordc.contributor.authorDupont, H. L.
Authordc.contributor.authorWoodward, T. E.
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T11:52:01Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-03-18T11:52:01Z
Publication datedc.date.issued1976
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationThe Lancet, Volume 308, Issue 7996, 27 November 1976, Pages 1155-1157
Identifierdc.identifier.issn01406736
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/S0140-6736(76)91678-0
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166448
Abstractdc.description.abstractTwo clinical trials were conducted to compare the efficacy of 3 antimicrobial agents often recommended for the treatment of typhoid fever. Chloramphenicol was more effective than parenteral ampicillin or oral co-trimoxazole (trimethaprim/ sulphamethoxazole) in reducing the duration of fever. Oral chloramphenicol was more effective than parenteral chloramphenicol probably because oral doses resulted in higher blood concentrations of the drug. However, parenteral chloramphenicol was given during the initial period of acute illness, without loss of efficacy.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Sourcedc.sourceThe Lancet
Keywordsdc.subjectMedicine (all)
Títulodc.titleComparative efficacy of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of typhoid fever
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatos
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación WoS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record