¿Se sustentan las Guías GES en trabajos
científicos financiados por los fondos de
CONICYT?
Author
dc.contributor.author
Núñez F., Paulina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Torres C., Adrián
Author
dc.contributor.author
Armas M., Rodolfo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-18T11:52:21Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-18T11:52:21Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Rev Med Chile 2014; 142: 1540-1546
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
07176163
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
00349887
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.4067/S0034-98872014001200007
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/166495
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: In Chile, 80 diseases were included in a health care system
called Health Care Guarantees (GES) and clinical guidelines were elaborated
for their management. Aim: To assess the scientific background of guidelines and
if they were based on research financed by the Chilean National Commission
for Science and Technology. Material and Methods: The references of the 82
guidelines developed for 80 diseases were reviewed, registering their number,
authors, country of origin and funding source. Results: The guidelines had a total
of 6,604 references. Of these, only 185 were Chilean (2.8%) and five (0.08%)
originated from research financed by the National Commission for Science and
Technology. Conclusions: The contribution of research funded by national
agencies to the formulation of clinical guidelines is minimal.