Principal approaches to understanding occupation and occupational science found in the Chilean journal of occupational therapy (2001–2012)
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morrison Jara, Rodolfo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gómez, Silvia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Henny, Enrique
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tapia, María Jesús
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rueda Castro, Laura
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-03-18T11:59:37Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-03-18T11:59:37Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2017
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017, Article ID 5413628, 11 pages
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
15570703
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
09667903
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1155/2017/5413628
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/167205
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background. The progression of occupational science in Chile is documented in the main scientific publication of the field, the
Chilean Journal of Occupational Therapy (RChTO). Objective. Identify approaches to understanding and applying occupation
and occupational science as elucidated in the RChTO. Methodology. A systematic qualitative review of the journal (2001–2012)
identified articles elucidating an approach to understanding and application operationally defined as references to specific authors,
theories, models/paradigms, definitions, and other fields that support approaches to O/OS. Results. The study identified two main
approaches. The first considers occupation/occupational science from a practical perspective or as a means to explain human
behavior; the second considers occupation/occupational science as an object of study. Each approach is further divided into
categories. Conclusion. This study provides a novel perspective on regional use of occupational science concepts. These findings
contribute to our understanding of this science in context and to recognition of the cultural relevance of these scientific concepts.