Analysis on extensions of multi-expert decision making model with respect to OWA-based aggregation processes
Author
dc.contributor.author
Yusoff, Binyamin
Author
dc.contributor.author
Merigó Lindahl, José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hornero, David Ceballos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-05-31T15:19:04Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-05-31T15:19:04Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, AISC, volume 730
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
21945357
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/978-3-319-75792-6_15
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169312
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In this paper, an analysis on extensions of multi-expert decision
making model based on ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators is presented.
The focus is on the aggregation of criteria and the aggregation of
individual judgment of experts. First, soft majority concept based on induced
OWA (IOWA) and generalized quantifiers to aggregate the experts’ judgments
is analyzed, in which concentrated on both classical and alternative schemes of
decision making model. Secondly, analysis on the weighting methods related to
unification of weighted average (WA) and OWA is conducted. An alternative
weighting technique is proposed which is termed as alternative OWA-WA
(AOWAWA) operator. The multi-expert decision making model then is
developed based on both aggregation processes and a comparison is made to see
the effect of different schemes for the fusion of soft majority opinions of experts
and distinct weighting techniques in aggregating the criteria. A numerical
example in the selection of investment strategy is provided for the comparison
purpose.