Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGajardo Cortez, Abraham 
Authordc.contributor.authorMadariaga, Samuel 
Authordc.contributor.authorMaldonado Arbogast, Pedro 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T15:33:59Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-05-31T15:33:59Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2019
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Neuroscience 59 (2019) 41–46
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15322653
Identifierdc.identifier.issn09675868
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jocn.2018.11.015
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169696
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Cardiovascular risk (CVR) biomarkers are of increasing interest because of their potential utility in management of cardiovascular diseases. The activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) is known to be highly correlated with CVR and therefore, is a putative biomarker. Common ANS measurement tools have several technological limitations and high-variance signals. The pupillary responses (PR) is controlled by both components of the ANS, and recent advances in pupillometry are making this measurement, easy and reliable. Thus, PR assessment could become a useful clinical tool to measure the ANS modulation and its relation to CVR. Here, we aimed to evaluate differences in PR between low CVR and moderate/high CVR individuals. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study. We recruited voluntaries with low CVR (group 1, n = 12) and patients with moderate/high CVR (group 2, n = 7). An eye tracker was used to measure PR to different visual stimulus that included colors (white, black, gray) and images with known emotional valence (pleasant, unpleasant and neutrals), which were intercalated by pink "noise" images. Differences in PR between both CVR groups were assessed by Mann Whitney U test of different epochs of the PR. Results: PR was significantly different between both CVR groups (p-value < 0,05) when the observed images were unpleasant, neutral, and pink noise, for different epochs of the PR. Conclusions: This is the first study that demonstrates that PR is different according to CVR. Thus, PR could be considered as a novel biomarker of CVR to be tested in prospective studies.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
Keywordsdc.subjectAutonomic nervous system
Keywordsdc.subjectBiomarkers
Keywordsdc.subjectCardiovascular risk
Keywordsdc.subjectPupillometry
Títulodc.titleAutonomic nervous system assessment by pupillary response as a potential biomarker for cardiovascular risk: A pilot study
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile