Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGonzález Pérez, Benito 
Authordc.contributor.authorAgapito, Ana 
Authordc.contributor.authorNovoa Muñoz, Francisco 
Authordc.contributor.authorVianna, Juliana 
Authordc.contributor.authorJohnson, Warren 
Authordc.contributor.authorMarín, Juan Carlos 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T15:16:08Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-04-23T15:16:08Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationForensic Science International: Genetics 45 (2020) 102226es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1872-4973
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102226
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174069
Abstractdc.description.abstractA molecular genetic protocol for distinguishing pure and hybrid South American camelids was developed to provide strong, quantifiable, and unbiased species identification. We detail the application of the approach in the context of a criminal case in the Andes Mountains of central Chile where the defendants were alleged to have illegally hunted three wild guanacos (Lama guanicoe), as opposed to hybrid domestic llama (Lama glama)/wild guanaco crosses, which are unregulated. We describe a workflow that differentiates among wild, domestic and hybrid South American camelids (Lama versus Vicugna) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b genetic variation (to distinguish between Lama and Vicugna), and MC1R and exon 4 variation of the ASIP gene (to differentiate wild from domestic species). Additionally, we infer the population origin and sex of each of the three individuals from a panel of 15 autosomal microsatellite loci and the presence or absence of the SRY gene. Our analyses strongly supported the inference that the confiscated carcasses corresponded with 2 male and 1 female guanacos that were hunted illegally. Statistical power analyses suggested that there was an extremely low probability of misidentifying domestic camelids as wild camelids (an estimated 0 % Type I error rate), or using more conservative approached a 1.17 % chance of misidentification of wild species as domestic camelids (Type II error). Our case report and methodological and analytical protocols demonstrate the power of genetic variation in coat color genes to identify hybrids between wild and domestic camelid species and highlight the utility of the approach to help combat illegal wildlife hunting and trafficking.
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipLaboratorio de Genomica y Biodiversidad, Universidad del Bio-Bio University of Durham, UK REDI-170208 National Research Council Research Associateship Award at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Researches_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceForensic Science International: Geneticses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGuanacoes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLlamaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHybrides_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCoat color geneses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGenetic forensicses_ES
Títulodc.titleUtility of genetic variation in coat color genes to distinguish wild, domestic and hybrid South American camelids for forensic and judicial applicationses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile