Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorDe Mucio, Bremen 
Authordc.contributor.authorBinfa Esbir, Lorena 
Authordc.contributor.authorPantoja Manzanarez, Loreto 
Authordc.contributor.authorPortela, Anayda 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T15:28:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-04-23T15:28:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRev Panam Salud Pública 44, 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.26633/RPSP.2020.19
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174072
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a companion of choice during labor and birth, to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes and women's satisfaction with health services. To better understand the status of companion of choice in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), an online survey was conducted with members of a midwifery virtual community of practice and with key informants, aiming to identify: 1) existing regulatory instruments related to companion of choice in the countries where the members are practicing; and, 2) key characteristics of implementation of companion of choice, where regulation exists. Responses (n = 112) were received from representatives of 20 of the 43 countries of LAC. Respondents reported existence of a national policy or legislation in seven countries, ministerial norms or institutional protocols in five countries, and no existing policy/protocol in eight countries. Respondents from the same country often provided contradictory responses. Responses differed from information provided by ministries of health in a WHO-led global policy survey in 11 instances. These variations may reflect that midwives were not always aware of the national policy/guideline in their country. We propose that a more robust effort should be undertaken to understand the status of companion of choice for labor and birth in LAC countries, at national, regional, and local level, in public and private facilities. It is important to know if policies exist, at what level of the system, and if key stakeholders, maternity-care health providers, and women are aware of their existence. Efforts should also be made to understand barriers to implementing companion of choice.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipWorld Health Organizationes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherPan Amer Health Organizationes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública-Pan American Journal of Public Healthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPatient satisfactiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMidwiferyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMaternal health serviceses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLatin Americaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCaribbean Regiones_ES
Títulodc.titleStatus of national policy on companion of choice a birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challengeses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCIELO


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile