Valuing the cost of improving chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
Author
dc.contributor.author
Olivera, Ignacio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Grau, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dibarboure, Hugo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Torres Torretti, Juan Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mieres, Gustavo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lazarov, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez, Fabián
Author
dc.contributor.author
López Yescas, Juan Guillermo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2020-05-25T13:19:50Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2020-05-25T13:19:50Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
BMC Health Services Research (2020) 20:295
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174916
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. Methods: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with whole-cell pertussis component (wP) plus IPV/OPV vaccines to a scheme with a hexavalent vaccine with acellular pertussis component (aP) and IPV (Hexaxim®) from a societal perspective. Cost data were collected from a variety of sources including national estimates and previous vaccine studies. All costs were expressed in 2017 prices (US$ 1.00=$Ch 666.26). Results: The overall costs associated with the vaccination scheme (4 doses of pentavalent vaccine plus 1 dose IPV and 3 doses OPV) from a societal perspective was estimated to be US$ 12.70 million, of which US$ 8.84 million were associated with the management of adverse events related to wP. In comparison, the cost associated with the 4-dose scheme with a hexavalent vaccine (based upon the PAHO reference price) was US$ 19.76 million. The cost of switching to the hexavalent vaccine would be an additional US$ 6.45 million. Overall, depending on the scenario, the costs of switching to the hexavalent scheme would range from an additional US$ 2.62 million to US$ 6.45 million compared with the current vaccination scheme. Conclusions: The switch to the hexavalent vaccine schedule in Chile would lead to additional acquisition costs, which would be partially offset by improved logistics, and a reduction in adverse events associated with the current vaccines.