Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorOlivera, Ignacio 
Authordc.contributor.authorGrau, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorDibarboure, Hugo 
Authordc.contributor.authorTorres Torretti, Juan Pablo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMieres, Gustavo 
Authordc.contributor.authorLazarov, Luis 
Authordc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Fabián 
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Yescas, Juan Guillermo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T13:19:50Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-05-25T13:19:50Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research (2020) 20:295es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174916
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. Methods: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with whole-cell pertussis component (wP) plus IPV/OPV vaccines to a scheme with a hexavalent vaccine with acellular pertussis component (aP) and IPV (Hexaxim®) from a societal perspective. Cost data were collected from a variety of sources including national estimates and previous vaccine studies. All costs were expressed in 2017 prices (US$ 1.00=$Ch 666.26). Results: The overall costs associated with the vaccination scheme (4 doses of pentavalent vaccine plus 1 dose IPV and 3 doses OPV) from a societal perspective was estimated to be US$ 12.70 million, of which US$ 8.84 million were associated with the management of adverse events related to wP. In comparison, the cost associated with the 4-dose scheme with a hexavalent vaccine (based upon the PAHO reference price) was US$ 19.76 million. The cost of switching to the hexavalent vaccine would be an additional US$ 6.45 million. Overall, depending on the scenario, the costs of switching to the hexavalent scheme would range from an additional US$ 2.62 million to US$ 6.45 million compared with the current vaccination scheme. Conclusions: The switch to the hexavalent vaccine schedule in Chile would lead to additional acquisition costs, which would be partially offset by improved logistics, and a reduction in adverse events associated with the current vaccines.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMCes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceBMC Health Services Researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVaccinationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCostes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPediatrices_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPolioes_ES
Títulodc.titleValuing the cost of improving chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccinees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile