Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorKhouly, Ismael 
Authordc.contributor.authorPardinas López, Simón 
Authordc.contributor.authorRuff, Ryan Richard 
Authordc.contributor.authorStrauss Avendaño, Franz Josef 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-06-15T22:46:03Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-06-15T22:46:03Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationClin Oral Investig. ( May 2020)es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s00784-020-03240-5
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/175487
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of growth factors (GF) on clinical outcomes after treatment (surgical/non-surgical) of peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis). Materials and methods A protocol was developed to answer the following focused question: Is there any difference for the use of GF for treatment of peri-implant diseases versus comparative GF treatment or without GF? Electronic database and manual searches were independently conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Publications were selected based on eligibility criteria and then assessed for risk-of-bias using the Cochrane Handbook. The primary outcome was probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) reduction along with changes in vertical defect depth (VDD). Changes in clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and plaque index, among others, were studied as secondary outcomes. Based on primary outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Results A total of five RCTs were included. GF enhance the reduction of PD (standardized mean difference (SMD) = - 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.75, - 0.79; p = < 0.0001) and BOP (SMD = - 1.23; 95% CI - 1.70, - 0.76; p = < 0.0001) in the management of peri-implant mucositis. For the treatment of peri-implantitis, the use of GF yielded to significantly greater improvement in VDD (SMD = 0.68; 95% CI 0.22, 1.14; p = 0.004); however, there were no significant differences in terms of PD (SMD = 0.08; 95% CI - 1.08, 1.26; p = 0.887) and BOP (SMD = 0.211; 95% CI - 0.20, 0.63; p = 0.317). The overall risk of bias of the included studies was low to unclear. Conclusion The results of the present systematic review suggest that the addition of GF might enhance the outcomes in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. However, there is a lack of evidence for supporting additional benefit of GF managing peri-implantitis.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_ES
Sourcedc.sourceClinical Oral Investigationses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGrowth factorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPeri-implant diseaseses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPeri-implantitises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPeri-implant mucositises_ES
Títulodc.titleEfficacy of growth factors for the treatment of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatoses_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorctces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record