Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorWarady, Bradley A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSchaefer, Franz 
Authordc.contributor.authorBagga, Arvind 
Authordc.contributor.authorCano Schuffeneger, Francisco 
Authordc.contributor.authorMcCulloch, Mignon 
Authordc.contributor.authorYap, Hui-Kim 
Authordc.contributor.authorShroff, Rukshana 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2020-07-28T23:18:35Z
Available datedc.date.available2020-07-28T23:18:35Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPeritoneal Dialysis International 40 (2020): 333–340es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1177/0896860819893805
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/176171
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains the most widely used modality for chronic dialysis in children, particularly in younger children and in lower and middle income countries (LMICs). We present guidelines for dialysis initiation, modality selection, small solute clearance, and fluid removal in children on PD. A review of the literature and key studies that support these statements are presented. Methods: An extensive Medline search for all publications on PD in children was performed using predefined search criteria. Results: High-quality randomized trials in children are scarce and current clinical practice largely relies on data extrapolated from adult studies or drawn from observational cohort studies in children. The evidence and strength of the recommendation is GRADE-ed, but in the absence of high-quality evidence, the opinion of the authors is provided and must be carefully considered by the treating physician, and adapted to local expertise and individual patient needs as appropriate. We discuss the timing of dialysis initiation, factors to be considered when selecting a dialysis modality, the assessment and management of volume status on PD, achieving optimal small solute clearance, and the importance of preserving residual kidney function. While optimal dialysis must remain the goal for every patient, a careful discussion with fully informed patients and caregivers is important to understand the patient and family's expectations of dialysis and reasonable adjustments to the dialysis program may be considered in accordance with a philosophy of shared decision-making. Conclusions: There continues to be very poor evidence in the field of chronic PD in children and these recommendations can at best serve to guide clinical decision-making. In LMICs, every effort should be made to conform to the framework of these statements, taking into account resource limitations.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSagees_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourcePeritoneal Dialysis Internationales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPeritoneal dialysis (PD)es_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAdequacyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectChildrenes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFluid overloades_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHydrationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPhosphatees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectQuality of lifees_ES
Títulodc.titlePrescribing peritoneal dialysis for high-quality care in childrenes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile