Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCustodio, Nilton 
Authordc.contributor.authorDuque, Lissette 
Authordc.contributor.authorMontesinos, Rosa 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlva Díaz, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorMellado, Martín 
Authordc.contributor.authorSlachevsky Chonchol, Andrea 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T19:12:41Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-01-21T19:12:41Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationFront. Aging Neurosci. 12:270es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178280
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA). Methods:A systematic search of titles and abstracts in Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Scopus, Scirus, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO was conducted. Inclusion criteria were papers written in English or Spanish involving samples from Spanish-speaking Latin American individuals published until 2018. Standard procedures were applied for reviewing the literature. The data related to the study sample, methodology, and procedures applied, as well as the performance obtained with the corresponding BCS, were collected and systematized. Results:Thirteen of 211 articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies primarily involved memory clinic-based samples, with the exception of two studies from an adult day-care center, one from a primary care clinic, and one from a community-based sample. All the studies originated from five of the 20 countries of LA and all used standardized diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI; however, the diagnostic protocols applied differed. Most studies reported samples with an average of 10 years of education and only one reported a sample with an average of <5 years of education. No publication to date has included an illiterate population. Although the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) is the most widely-used BCS tool in LA, it is significantly influenced by education level. Conclusions:Although evidence is still limited, the findings from studies on LA populations suggest that MoCA requires cultural adaptations and different cutoff points according to education level. Moreover, the diagnostic validity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) test should be evaluated in populations with a low level of education. Given the heterogeneity that exists in the levels of education in LA, more studies involving illiterate and indigenous populations are required.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipANID/FONDAP Program 15150012 ANID/FONDEF Grant ID18I10113 Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceFrontiers in Aging Neurosciencees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCognitive screeninges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDementiaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseasees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMild cognitive impairment,es_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMoCAes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLatin Americaes_ES
Títulodc.titleSystematic review of the diagnostic validity of brief cognitive screenings for early dementia detection in spanish-speaking adults in Latin Americaes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorctces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile