Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBravo Advis, Daniela 
Authordc.contributor.authorLayera Ramos, Sebastián 
Authordc.contributor.authorAliste Muñoz, Julián 
Authordc.contributor.authorJara Schnettler, Álvaro 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Mujica, Diego 
Authordc.contributor.authorBarrientos Mendoza, Cristián 
Authordc.contributor.authorWulf Ibáñez, Rodrigo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMuñoz del Solar, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorFinlayson, Roderick J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorTran, De Q. 
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of ClinicaL Anesthesia (2020) 66: 109907es_ES
Abstractdc.description.abstractStudy objective: Comparison of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized equivalence trial. Setting: University Hospital. Patients: Sixty patients undergoing primary THA. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided LPB (n = 30) or SIFIB (n = 30). The local anesthetic agent (40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL) and block adjuvant (4 mg of intravenous dexamethasone) were identical in all subjects. Postoperatively, all patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (morphine) as well as acetaminophen and ketoprofen during 48 h. Measurements: A blinded investigator recorded morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h as well as time to first morphine request, pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, incidence of adverse events, time to readiness for discharge, and length of hospital stay. The blinded investigator also carried out sensorimotor block assessment at 3, 6 and 24 h using a 10-point sensorimotor composite scale. Main results: No intergroup differences were found in terms of cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h (95% CI: - 4.0 mg to 2.0 mg) and 48 h (95% CI, - 5.0 mg to 2.0 mg) or time to first morphine request. Furthermore, pain scores were similar at all time intervals after 3 h. There were no intergroup differences in terms of composite sensorimotor scores at 3 and 6 h. However, SIFIB lasted longer than lumbar plexus block as evidenced by a higher composite score at 24 h. No intergroup differences were found in terms of complications. Compared with LPB, SIFIB was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge (3 [1-4] vs. 2 [1-3] days; P = 0.042) and length of hospital stay (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4] days; P = 0.048). Conclusions: For THA, no differences were found between LPB and SIFIB in terms of breakthrough morphine requirement and pain control. However, SIFIB resulted in a longer block and was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge as well as decreased hospital stay.es_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.uri*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of ClinicaL Anesthesiaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFascia iliaca blockes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLumbar plexus blockes_ES
Títulodc.titleLumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized triales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile