Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial
Artículo
![Thumbnail](/themes/Mirage2/images/cubierta.jpg)
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso Abierto
Publication date
2020Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Bravo Advis, Daniela
Cómo citar
Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial
Author
Abstract
Study objective: Comparison of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Design: Randomized equivalence trial.
Setting: University Hospital.
Patients: Sixty patients undergoing primary THA.
Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided LPB (n = 30) or SIFIB (n = 30). The local anesthetic agent (40 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL) and block adjuvant (4 mg of intravenous dexamethasone) were identical in all subjects. Postoperatively, all patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (morphine) as well as acetaminophen and ketoprofen during 48 h.
Measurements: A blinded investigator recorded morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h as well as time to first morphine request, pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, incidence of adverse events, time to readiness for discharge, and length of hospital stay. The blinded investigator also carried out sensorimotor block assessment at 3, 6 and 24 h using a 10-point sensorimotor composite scale.
Main results: No intergroup differences were found in terms of cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h (95% CI: - 4.0 mg to 2.0 mg) and 48 h (95% CI, - 5.0 mg to 2.0 mg) or time to first morphine request. Furthermore, pain scores were similar at all time intervals after 3 h. There were no intergroup differences in terms of composite sensorimotor scores at 3 and 6 h. However, SIFIB lasted longer than lumbar plexus block as evidenced by a higher composite score at 24 h. No intergroup differences were found in terms of complications. Compared with LPB, SIFIB was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge (3 [1-4] vs. 2 [1-3] days; P = 0.042) and length of hospital stay (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4] days; P = 0.048).
Conclusions: For THA, no differences were found between LPB and SIFIB in terms of breakthrough morphine requirement and pain control. However, SIFIB resulted in a longer block and was associated with shorter time to readiness for discharge as well as decreased hospital stay.
Indexation
Artículo de publicación ISI Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Identifier
URI: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178317
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109907
Quote Item
Journal of ClinicaL Anesthesia (2020) 66: 109907
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: