Mid-term follow-up of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: An experience in Latin America
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sepúlveda, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hameau, René
Author
dc.contributor.author
Backhouse, Christian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Charme, Gustavo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pacheco, Francisco
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ramírez, Pablo A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fuensalida, Alberto J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Quitral, Jorge
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Gonzalo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, José A.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-26T21:51:23Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-01-26T21:51:23Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;1–10
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1002/ccd.29322
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178345
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives To describe the characteristics of patients who undergo balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and report the mid-term outcomes. Background BPA has been recently introduced in Latin America. Mid-term results have not been published. Methods Prospective Chilean Registry of inoperable CTEPH patients who underwent BPA. Clinical variables were analyzed at baseline, after each procedure and at follow-up. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after the last BPA. Results Between August 2016 and September 22, 2019 patients (17 women), 59 +/- 12.7 years, underwent 81 BPA and were followed for as long as 33.1 months (mean 17.3 +/- 7.5). Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased by 17.4% (51.1 +/- 12 vs. 42.2 +/- 13 mmHg,p= .001), pulmonary vascular resistance by 23.9% (766.7 +/- 351 vs. 583 +/- 346 dynes/s/cm(-5),p= .001), cardiac index increased by 8% (2.3 +/- 0.54 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.54 L/min/m(2),p= .012), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased by 73.8% (1,685 +/- 1,045 vs. 441.8 +/- 276 pg/dl,p= .006), and 6-min walk distance improved by 135 m (316.7 +/- 94 vs. 451.1 +/- 113 m,p= .001). One patient (4.5%) developed lung reperfusion injury and four patients (18.2%) had minor bleeding (hemoptysis), after the procedure. There was no mortality associated with BPA. Conclusions Our results confirm that BPA for inoperable CTEPH is a relatively safe procedure that improves clinical and hemodynamic parameters in the mid-term. This therapy should be considered as an alternative, mainly in places where access to PAH therapy or surgery is restricted.