How reliable is the next generation of multiplex-PCR for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection compared to the MSIS criteria? Still missing the ideal test
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lausmann, Christian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kolle, Kim Niklas
Author
dc.contributor.author
Citak, Mustafa
Author
dc.contributor.author
Abdelaziz, Hussein
Author
dc.contributor.author
Schulmeyer, Juan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Delgado, Gio D.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gehrke, Thorsten
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gebauer, Matthias
Author
dc.contributor.author
Zahar, Akos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-26T21:57:46Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-01-26T21:57:46Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
HIP International 2020, Vol. 30(1S) 72–77
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1177/1120700020938576
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178348
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: Identification of the pathogen in case of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains 1 of the greatest
challenges in septic surgery. Rapid germ identification enables timely, specific, antimicrobial therapy. The first multiplex
PCR (polymerase chain reaction) generation (Unyvero-i60) enables germ detection within 5hours with a sensitivity
of 78.8% and a specificity of 100%. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the new generation of
cartridges (Unyvero-ITI) of multiplex PCR in the case of a PJI.
Methods: In a prospective study, intraoperatively aspirated synovial fluid from 97 patients with aseptic or septic hip or
knee revision surgery (49 aseptic, 48 septic) was examined with the multiplex PCR system (Unyvero-ITI) and the results
were compared with the MSIS criteria. In addition, the time until the microbiological result was obtained in the event
of a germ detection was documented.
Results: The multiplex PCR showed a germ detection with a sensitivity of 85.1% and a specificity of 98.0%. In 7 cases
a false negative result was found and in one patient a false positive result was found. The general accuracy of this test
procedure was 91.8%. The detection of germs was carried out within 5hours with the multiplex PCR compared to
4.9days in conventional microbiological diagnostics.
Conclusions: The new generation of multiplex-PCR was able to improve germ detection. The possibility of prompt
detection of germs offers the option of faster, targeted antimicrobial therapy. This diagnostic tool offers significant
advantages, particularly in the context of an acute periprosthetic infection.
How reliable is the next generation of multiplex-PCR for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection compared to the MSIS criteria? Still missing the ideal test