Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorDockendorff Valdés, Andrés 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T22:10:47Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-03-08T22:10:47Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations Volumen: 23 Número: 1 Páginas: 139-157 Sep 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1177/1369148120949978
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178597
Abstractdc.description.abstractThis article offers an empirical test of why some legislators' bills are more likely to move forward in the legislative process. We argue that who signs the bill matters when it comes to the level of support that the proposal receives. Successful bills will be sponsored by a greater number of members (bandwagonfactor) and political adversaries (support across the aislefactor). On the contrary, failed initiatives will be those sponsored by inexperienced parliamentarians (newcomersfactor). We examine the case of Chile and test the expectations with legislative data on parliamentarians' bills.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSagees_ES
Sourcedc.sourceBritish Journal of Politics and International Relationses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBill sponsorshipes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectInformation aggregationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectIntra-legislative signallinges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLegislative successes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectParliamentarians' billses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectReactive legislatureses_ES
Títulodc.titleWhy are some parliamentarians' bills more likely to progress? Sponsorship as a signales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatoses_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlajes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record