Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorKuchler, Ulrike 
Authordc.contributor.authorHeimel, Patrick 
Authordc.contributor.authorStaehli, Alexandra 
Authordc.contributor.authorStrauss, Franz Josef 
Authordc.contributor.authorLuza, Bernadette 
Authordc.contributor.authorGruber, Reinhard 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T21:08:09Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-04-29T21:08:09Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationMaterials 2020, 13, 4748es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3390/ma13214748
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/179354
Abstractdc.description.abstractDeproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is brittle and can break into fragments. Here, we examined whether DBBM fragments have an impact on mice calvarial bone during bone augmentation. DBBM was either randomly crushed (DBBM fragments) or left undisturbed (DBBM granules). Then, DBBM fragments or original DBBM granules were placed onto calvarial bone in 20 BALB/c mice. Following random allocation, ten mice received DBBM fragments and ten mice received original DBBM granules. After fourteen days of healing, micro computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis of the augmented sites were performed. The primary outcome was the porosity of the calvarial bone. The micro-CT analysis revealed that DBBM fragments failed to significantly change the porosity of the calvarial bone as compared with original DBBM granules, despite the slightly higher bone resorption in the DBBM fragment group, 10.3% (CI 6.3-11.6) versus 6.1% (CI 4.1-7.8, p = 0.355), respectively. The cortical bone volume was not altered by DBBM fragments as compared with original DBBM granules, i.e., 79.0% (CI 78.9-81.2) versus 81.5% (CI 80.1-83.3, p = 0.357), respectively. The DBBM fragment group revealed similar bone thickness values as compared with the DBBM granules group, i.e., 0.26 mm (CI 0.23-0.29) versus 0.25 mm (CI 0.22-0.27, p = 0.641), respectively. The histological evaluation supported the micro-CT observations, displaying minor signs of porosity and resorption. The particle-size distribution analysis confirmed a shift towards smaller particle sizes in the DBBM fragment group. These findings suggest that DBBM fragments behave similarly to original DBBM granules in terms of bone morphological changes at augmented sites.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipOsteology Foundation, Switzerland 14-126 Osteology Foundation 17-219 Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherMDPIes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceMaterialses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBone augmentationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGuided bone regenerationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOsteoclastes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBiomateriales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDBBMes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMousees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectResorptiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCalvarial bonees_ES
Títulodc.titleImpact of DBBM fragments on the porosity of the calvarial bone: A pilot study on micees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile