Author | dc.contributor.author | Ihnen Jory, Constanza | |
Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T22:39:23Z | |
Available date | dc.date.available | 2021-06-07T22:39:23Z | |
Publication date | dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Argumentation in Context Volumen: 9 Número: 3 Páginas: 399-427 Dec 2020 | es_ES |
Identifier | dc.identifier.other | 10.1075/jaic.19010.ihn | |
Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/180029 | |
Abstract | dc.description.abstract | This paper outlines a non-exhaustive inventory of presumptive argument schemes that can be used by legislators to rationally argue for and against the legitimacy of legislative ends. The inventory has both a descriptive and normative dimension. The inventory is descriptive because it is partly based on the empirical observation of arguments actually used by legislators in a sample of lawmaking debates. However, the inventory is also normative because - as I shall argue in this paper - the schemes identified in the sample are presumptive arguments schemes. They are therefore schemes with a claim to rationality, provided that certain conditions are met. The schemes included in the inventory are: the scheme of instrumental argumentation, the scheme from unintended consequences, the scheme from values, the schemes from model and antimodel, and the schemes from social demand. | es_ES |
Patrocinador | dc.description.sponsorship | CONICYT FONDECYT/INICIACION 2016
11160149 | es_ES |
Lenguage | dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
Publisher | dc.publisher | John Benjamins | es_ES |
Source | dc.source | Journal of Argumentation in Context | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Practical rationality | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Discourse principle | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Legislative debates | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Argument scheme from consequences | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Argument scheme from values | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Argument scheme from model | es_ES |
Keywords | dc.subject | Argument schemes from social demand | es_ES |
Título | dc.title | Deliberating over legislative ends An inventory of goal-(de)legitimizing argument schemes | es_ES |
Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | es_ES |
dcterms.accessRights | dcterms.accessRights | Acceso a solo metadatos | es_ES |
Cataloguer | uchile.catalogador | crb | es_ES |
Indexation | uchile.index | Artículo de publicación SCOPUS | |