Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorDíaz, Angélica 
Authordc.contributor.authorAedo, Sócrates 
Authordc.contributor.authorBurky, Daniela 
Authordc.contributor.authorCatalán, Alejandra 
Authordc.contributor.authorAguirre, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorAcevedo, Mónica 
Authordc.contributor.authorPoehls, Renate 
Authordc.contributor.authorPuebla, Valeria 
Authordc.contributor.authorGuerra, Francisco 
Authordc.contributor.authorSepúlveda, Waldo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-07-05T20:34:46Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-07-05T20:34:46Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Maternal-FetaL & NeonataL Medicine 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1080/14767058.2020.1868430
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/180408
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the role of cervical length when predicting vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section (CS) in women with low Bishop score following the use of a double-balloon catheter for induction of labor (IOL). Methods: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted at a large teaching hospital in Santiago to recruit pregnant women at term with a previous CS and Bishop score 6 for IOL with a double-balloon catheter. The device was maintained for up to 24 h and the patient continued IOL with oxytocin only if the Bishop score was >6. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded and compared against vaginal delivery as the primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare perinatal demographic and clinical variables in women achieving vaginal delivery versus those having a repeat CS. Results: The final cohort included 40 pregnant women. Women achieving vaginal delivery (n ¼ 17, 42.5%) had statistically significant differences in mean cervical length (24.8mm versus 33.4 mm, respectively; p¼.006), median Bishop score after removing the double-balloon catheter (11 versus 7, respectively; p¼.005), and mean interval between double-balloon catheter placement and vaginal delivery or the decision to perform a CS (17.4 h versus 23.6 h, respectively; p¼.03). Backward stepwise selection revealed an odds ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval ¼ 0.82 0.98) for cervical length and a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.73. Conclusion: Cervical length, as determined by transvaginal sonography, proved to be effective in predicting vaginal delivery in women with a previous CS and low Bishop score following the use of a double-balloon catheter for IOL.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipSociedad Profesional de Medicina Fetal `Fetalmed' Ltda., Chilees_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherTaylor and Francises_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Maternal-FetaL & NeonataL Medicinees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCervical lengthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDoubleballoon catheteres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectInduction of labores_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPrevious cesarean sectiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTransvaginal ultrasoundes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVaginal deliveryes_ES
Títulodc.titleSonographic cervical length predicts vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section in women with low Bishop score induced with a doubleballoon catheteres_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile