Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBrañes, Julián
Authordc.contributor.authorBarahona Vásquez, Maximiliano
Authordc.contributor.authorCarvajal, Sebastián
Authordc.contributor.authorWulf Ibáñez, Rodrigo
Authordc.contributor.authorBarrientos Mendoza, Cristián
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T21:09:42Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-11-29T21:09:42Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2021) 16:517es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1186/s13018-021-02653-6
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182928
Abstractdc.description.abstractPurpose Currently, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the standard instruments used to compare arthroplasty results. Goodman et al. recently published a well-constructed scale with excellent psychometric properties that can be quickly administered. The main objective of our study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods The original Goodman scale was translated into Spanish and cross-culturally adapted. Then, the data from this version were tested for psychometric quality. We designed a cross-sectional study for data collection. This study enrolled 2 institutions. Patients who underwent hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included. A total of 153 patients were contacted twice to record the Goodman and Oxford hip scales (OHS) to assess the validity of the questionnaire. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha, Concordance using 3 test: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and the Bradley-Blackwood F test. The spearman correlation was used to asses correlation between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale. Results The overall satisfaction after THA was reported to be "very satisfied" by 137 patients (75%), and only 14 patients reported some degree of dissatisfaction (6%). The improvement in quality of life was reported to be "more than I ever dreamed possible" by 41% patients. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable, reaching a coefficient of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1). No statistical difference (t test, p = 0.55) was found in the original version, with great internal validity. Test re-test concordance was optimal among the 3 tests used. A moderate correlation was found between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale. Conclusion The Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in THA is a reliable, consistent, and feasible scale to evaluate patient satisfaction and improvement in the quality of life in Spanish speakers.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherBMCes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTotal hip arthroplastyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPROMses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCross-cultural adaptationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTranslationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSatisfactiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectValidation studieses_ES
Títulodc.titleValidation of the Spanish version of the Goodman score in total hip arthroplastyes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States