Validation of the Spanish version of the Goodman score in total hip arthroplasty
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brañes, Julián
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barahona Vásquez, Maximiliano
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carvajal, Sebastián
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wulf Ibáñez, Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barrientos Mendoza, Cristián
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-11-29T21:09:42Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-11-29T21:09:42Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2021) 16:517
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/s13018-021-02653-6
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182928
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Purpose Currently, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the standard instruments used to compare arthroplasty results. Goodman et al. recently published a well-constructed scale with excellent psychometric properties that can be quickly administered. The main objective of our study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods The original Goodman scale was translated into Spanish and cross-culturally adapted. Then, the data from this version were tested for psychometric quality. We designed a cross-sectional study for data collection. This study enrolled 2 institutions. Patients who underwent hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included. A total of 153 patients were contacted twice to record the Goodman and Oxford hip scales (OHS) to assess the validity of the questionnaire. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha, Concordance using 3 test: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and the Bradley-Blackwood F test. The spearman correlation was used to asses correlation between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale. Results The overall satisfaction after THA was reported to be "very satisfied" by 137 patients (75%), and only 14 patients reported some degree of dissatisfaction (6%). The improvement in quality of life was reported to be "more than I ever dreamed possible" by 41% patients. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable, reaching a coefficient of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1). No statistical difference (t test, p = 0.55) was found in the original version, with great internal validity. Test re-test concordance was optimal among the 3 tests used. A moderate correlation was found between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale. Conclusion The Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in THA is a reliable, consistent, and feasible scale to evaluate patient satisfaction and improvement in the quality of life in Spanish speakers.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
BMC
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States