Early adverse stress and depressive and bipolar disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment interventions
Artículo
Open/ Download
Access note
Acceso abierto
Publication date
2021Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Martínez, Pablo
Cómo citar
Early adverse stress and depressive and bipolar disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment interventions
Author
Abstract
A significant proportion of adults with depressive or bipolar disorders
exposed to early adverse stressors do not adequately respond to standard treatments.
This review aimed at synthesizing the evidence on the effectiveness of treatment
interventions for depressive or bipolar disorders in adult individuals (aged 18 years or
more) exposed to adverse stress early in life.
Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis including experimental and
quasi-experimental published studies indexed in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web
of Science databases and/or in reference lists. Data management and critical appraisal
(with the Study Quality Assessment Tools) was conducted independently by multiple
researchers. A quality-effects model for meta-analysis was used for data synthesis and
publication bias was assessed using the Doi plot and LFK index. The main outcome was
short-term reductions in depressive symptoms.
Results: Eight randomized controlled trials, three controlled before-and-after (pre-post)
studies, and three uncontrolled before-and-after studies were included. Studies
lacked bipolar disorder patients. Unclear randomization procedures and reporting of
blinded outcome assessor, and limited use of intention-to-treat analysis, were relevant
potential sources of bias. Meta-analyses indicated that psychological, pharmacological,
and combined interventions were effective in reducing depressive symptoms in the
short- (Cohen’s d = −0.55, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.36, I2 = 0%) and mid-term (Cohen’s
d = −0.66, 95% CI −1.07 to −0.25, I2 = 65.0%). However, a high risk of publication
bias was detected for these outcomes. A small number of studies, with mixed results,
reported interventions with long-term improvements in depressive symptomatology, and
short- and mid-term response to treatment and remission.
Conclusion: Despite the well-documented long-lasting, negative, and costly impact of
early adverse stressors on adult psychopathology, evidence on treatment alternatives
remains scant. Trauma-focused treatment interventions—whether psychological interventions alone or in combination with pharmacotherapy—may have the potential to
reduce the severity of depressive symptom in adults who were exposed to early adverse
stress. Findings must be interpreted with considerable caution, as important study and
outcome-level limitations were observed and gray literature was not considered in this
systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patrocinador
ANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program NCS17_035
ANID Millennium Science Initiative/Millennium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality MIDAP ICS13_005
Indexation
Artículo de publícación WoS Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
Quote Item
Frontiers in Psychiatry April 2021 Volume 12 Article 650706
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: