Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCarmona Puerta, Raimundo
Authordc.contributor.authorLorenzo Martínez, Elizabeth
Authordc.contributor.authorRabassa López-Calleja, Magda Alina
Authordc.contributor.authorPadrón Pena, Gustavo
Authordc.contributor.authorCastro Torres, Yaniel
Authordc.contributor.authorCruz Elizundia, Juan Miguel
Authordc.contributor.authorRodríguez González, Fernando
Authordc.contributor.authorGarcía Vázquez, Luis Ángel
Authordc.contributor.authorChávez González, Elibet
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T18:21:27Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-03-14T18:21:27Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationMed Princ Pract 2021;30:462–469es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1159/000518262
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/184170
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS). Subjects and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated. Results: The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: 82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%). Conclusions: Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherKargeres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceMedical Principles and Practicees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAtrial conduction timees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectP-wavees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectElectrocardiogrames_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAtrial fibrillationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectElectrophysiological studyes_ES
Títulodc.titleNew parameter of the second half of the p-wave, p-wave duration, and atrial conduction times predict atrial fibrillation during electrophysiological studieses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States