Interventions to reduce stigma towards mental disorders in young people: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Núñez, Daniel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Borghero, Francesca
Author
dc.contributor.author
Campos, Susana
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Nahuel, Vania Angélica
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-04-11T13:55:24Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-04-11T13:55:24Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
BMJ Open 2021;11:e045726
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045726
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/184824
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Introduction The stigma towards mental disorders can limit the use and effectiveness of available mental health interventions for young people. We aim to systematically review effectiveness of interventions to reduce stigma towards mental disorders in young people, as evidence has not been recently and systematically synthesised on this topic. Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised or controlled clinical trials of interventions to reduce stigma towards mental disorders in people aged 10-24 years. Studies involving a comparison group, post intervention and/or follow-up assessments of knowledge, attitudes and/or behaviours towards mental disorders (including help-seeking behaviours), will be included. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PubMed and PsycINFO databases will be searched, without time limits, for eligible studies in English or Spanish, and with results available. Databases will be searched from July 2020 to April 2021. The study selection process, the data extraction and the critical evaluation-with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool-of included studies will be performed independently and in duplicate by teams of reviewers, with the assistance of a third party, until reaching a high degree of agreement. In the presence of substantial heterogeneity (I-2 >75%), a narrative synthesis of the study results will be used. If feasible, we will also conduct a quality effects model for the statistical synthesis of results. If sufficient data are available, subgroup analyses will be performed to assess potential sources of heterogeneity. Doi plots and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori index will be used to assess publication bias. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the confidence in the evidence reviewed. Ethics and dissemination Results are expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the field of adolescent and/or youth mental health.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
ANID -Millennium Science Initiative Program NCS17_035
Programa de Investigacion Asociativa (PIA) en Ciencias Cognitivas, Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad de Talca
ANID ICS13_005
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
BMJ
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States